|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: [suse-security] Invisible X?
From: Roman Drahtmueller (draht
uni-freiburg.de)Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:56:49 CDT
- Next message: Steven T. Hatton: "[suse-security] syslog.conf and tcpd?"
- Previous message: Daniel L. Donahue: "Re: [suse-security] Invisible X?"
- In reply to: Daniel L. Donahue: "Re: [suse-security] Invisible X?"
- Next in thread: Ragnar Beer: "Re: [suse-security] Invisible X?"
- Reply: Roman Drahtmueller: "Re: [suse-security] Invisible X?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Howdy! I like to have as many as possible ports closed. Is it
> > possible to configure X in a way that it's only "visible" for
> > localhost/127.0.0.1 ?
> >
> Run your Xserver or Xwrapper with the "-nolisten tcp" option, or
> firewall deny port 6000.
>
> dan
Negative... If you happen to run display no :1 you'd listen on port
6001. "-nolisten tcp" is perfect, though.
Roman.
-- _ _ | Roman Drahtmüller "Freedom means that you can choose | CC University of Freiburg what you want to learn at a given | email: drahtuni-freiburg.de time." A. Becker, 1999 | - - People often find it easier to be a result of the past than a cause of the future.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe
suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help
suse.com
- Next message: Steven T. Hatton: "[suse-security] syslog.conf and tcpd?"
- Previous message: Daniel L. Donahue: "Re: [suse-security] Invisible X?"
- In reply to: Daniel L. Donahue: "Re: [suse-security] Invisible X?"
- Next in thread: Ragnar Beer: "Re: [suse-security] Invisible X?"
- Reply: Roman Drahtmueller: "Re: [suse-security] Invisible X?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]