Forwarded from: William Knowles <wkc4i.org>

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/030110.html

10-Jan-2003

Dear Cecil:

I have an Armchair University degree in English linguistics, and I was
thinking about the "l33t5p33k" we see on the Net these days, as well
as the Princification of the language, the replacement of "you" with
"u" and "to" with "2," etc. Is this just bad English, or is this the
next step? Will the English language in 100 years look like the
rantings of a 15-year-old hacker as we see it now, and will numbers
become letters (1 = I, 2 = to, 3 = E, 4 = for, 5 = S, etc)?
--Montfort, via the Straight Dope Message Board

Cecil replies:

Let's put this in perspective, Montfort. Your columnist grew up in the
60s, which as everyone knows was the coolest era in the history of
existence. The collective output of the leading lights of that
time--your Stones, your Zep, etc--obliterated everything that had gone
before. Sure, your Andy Williams types were still putting out records,
and I guess somebody must have bought them (presumably the same people
who are presently packing the theaters in Branson, Missouri). But
everybody with a clue knew: Those guys were old. They were out of it.
They were lame.

That said, I fully expected the next generation to come along with
some even more radical pop-cultural contribution that would leave us
60s burnouts in the dust. Didn't happen, at least not right away.
During the early 80s I was shocked to overhear a couple 17-year-olds
talking about going to a Grateful Dead concert. I wanted to say: You
twerps, your parents went to Grateful Dead concerts. You're supposed
to think the Grateful Dead suck. There's something terribly wrong with
a world in which kids think their elders' culture is hip.

Eventually, thank God, there was rap. I was relieved to find that I
hated rap. There were times when it was all I could do to keep from
growling how can you kids listen to that noise? I tell you, it did my
heart good.

Now comes 133t5p33k, proof that the flames of intergenerational
antagonism burn as brightly as ever. Used mainly by teenage chat-room
geeks, gamers, and wannabe h4x0r5 (hackers), 133t5p33k replaces
standard letterforms with others looking vaguely similar, e.g., 1 for
L, 3 for E, 5 for S, and so on (see www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet for a
rundown). Thus 133t5p33k transliterates to "leetspeek." The
uninitiated will now ask: What's a leet? It's short for elite, j00
14m3r (j = Y, 4 = A). No one is sure where the name came from, but the
meaning is clear enough: Only the elite (i.e., your friends, who are
definitely not over 40) are supposed to understand it. Leet involves
multiple layers of coding, the better to trip up the unhip. Thus "you
are" becomes u r, "the" is purposely misspelled t3h (leetists have
adopted common typos as a point of pride), K3W1357 means
kewlest/coolest, w4r3z (wares) is slang for pirated software, and so
on.

On the scale of linguistic complexity, basic leet is about on a par
with pig Latin, and with five minutes' practice just about anyone can
crank out elegant prose such as: y cN'+ p30p13 R3kO9nIZ3 +eh 834UTy
uv 1337??? (Apologies to acconav of the Straight Dope Message Board,
from whom I lifted this example.) Recognizing this, some 1337!575 are
promoting "advanced" leetspeek, which they believe takes things to a
new level. Sample: 4|)V4|\|C3D l3e+$peA|< i$ whEn J00 +4lK L1K3
t|-|15. t0 u|\|d3r$+|\|D jOo |\/|u5+ be lEET. 1f J00 4r3 NO+ lEe+ jOO
C|\|N0T 5p3A|< 0r ReAd +|-|I5. Stumped? I wasn't either. But I bet a
lot of parental units are scratching their heads.

At this point you may be thinking: This is |-|0r535|-|17. That's what
you're supposed to think, ancient one. Leet is for kids. The whole
point is to communicate only with the chosen few, and to frustrate
everybody else. That's why there's little danger of leet taking over
the English language, which by contrast is useful because it's so
widely understood. It's possible that bits of leet will migrate into
the mainstream; after all, one of the best-known expressions in
English, OK, entered the language during a leetlike fad for silly
initials that flourished in U.S. newspapers in the late 1830s (OK
stood for "oll korrect"). But so far I'm not seeing much mention of
d00dz in the New York Times.

Leet is a game at which more than one generation can play, for better
or worse. In a recent discussion of leet on the SDMB, members amused
themselves with remarks such as: 13375Þ33|‹ ¡5 p07 \/\/31¢0/\/\3 µ3®3
(Jeff Olsen). This inspired the snappy rejoinder 7®|_| |)47, 5|_|¢|<4
(mouthbreather), leading fallom, the 1337!57 who had started it all,
to concede, y0ur 1337 0wnz0r5 m1n3. 1 4dm17 d3f347 (the 0r5 is usually
ignored). But the most typographically impressive comment came from
eunoia: £==7§¶=/‹ ¿‡<=§ µ= 3§§‡>= #=Ð(c)#=. (Hints: = is E, ‡
is I, > and < are both V.) A bit cranky, but anyone over 40 who's
gotten this far will no doubt agree.

-- CECIL ADAMS

Cecil Adams can deliver the Straight Dope on any topic. Write Cecil at
cecilchicagoreader.com

*==============================================================*
"Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence
without communications is irrelevant." Gen Alfred. M. Gray, USMC
================================================================
C4I.org - Computer Security, & Intelligence - http://www.c4i.org
*==============================================================*

-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org

To unsubscribe email majordomoattrition.org with 'unsubscribe isn'
in the BODY of the mail.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]