|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: RE: Microsoft's UUIDs
From: M****** R****** (m***
swirl.com)Date: Thu Oct 12 2000 - 13:33:09 CDT
- Next message: Bram Cohen: "Re: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Previous message: Rich Salz: "Re: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- In reply to: Rich Salz: "Re: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Next in thread: Bram Cohen: "Re: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Next in thread: Ian Farquhar - NSW SE Team Leader: "Re: human failings question"
- Reply: Michael Roberts: "RE: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That is most helpful. "_c word" == _cannot_ ;), which I thought a strong
word to use without any supporting material. I am suprised this was allowed
to expire.
--m
> I don't know what you mean by "_c", but UUID's are now probably done
> using random identifiers. Paul Leach of Microsoft and I wrote an IETF
> internet-draft describing the UUID formats and various ways of
> generating them, including IEE802 address and random-number. Ted T'so
> was an early implementor and helped significantly. You can get the
> expired draft from my web pages:
> http://www.shore.net/~rsalz/uuid-i-d.txt .
>
> The draft was allowed to expire because of "change control" issues
> between OSF (now The Open Group), the IETF, questions as to whether it
> was really necessary, etc ...
>
> /r$
- Next message: Bram Cohen: "Re: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Previous message: Rich Salz: "Re: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- In reply to: Rich Salz: "Re: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Next in thread: Bram Cohen: "Re: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Next in thread: Ian Farquhar - NSW SE Team Leader: "Re: human failings question"
- Reply: Michael Roberts: "RE: Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]