|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: human failings question
From: Damien Miller (djm
mindrot.org)Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 20:06:10 CDT
- Next message: Michael Roberts: "Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Previous message: John Kelsey: "Re: Rijndael & Hitachi"
- In reply to: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton: "Re: human failings question"
- Next in thread: Michael Roberts: "Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Reply: Damien Miller: "Re: human failings question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> not long after, camelot introduced a "random-ness" option: the POS
> computer would generate 6 random numbers _for_ you, if you so chose.
It would be interesting to find out how gaming machines generate their
"random" numbers. Do they use hardware of software?
There would be some interesting attack possibilities if they were to
use LCGs with small states, but surely they'd be smarter than that ;)
-d
-- | ``The power of accurate observation is | Damien Miller <djmmindrot.org> | commonly called cynicism by those who |
Work <djm
ibs.com.au> | have not got it'' - George Bernard Shaw | http://www.mindrot.org
- Next message: Michael Roberts: "Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Previous message: John Kelsey: "Re: Rijndael & Hitachi"
- In reply to: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton: "Re: human failings question"
- Next in thread: Michael Roberts: "Microsoft's UUIDs"
- Reply: Damien Miller: "Re: human failings question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]