stream.c/raped.c tests (just for stats)

Subject: stream.c/raped.c tests (just for stats)
From: Vanja Hrustic (vanjaRELAYGROUP.COM)
Date: Fri Jan 21 2000 - 15:01:37 CST

• Next message: FEAR Advisories: "*BSD procfs vulnerability"
• Previous message: Microsoft Product Security: "Microsoft Security Bulletin (MS00-004)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi. Since everybody will probably start submitting the 'results' of
stream.c/raped.c testing, I'll do it too :)

Absolutelly nothing (except usual 'bandwidth rape' DoS against poor
10Mbit LAN link :) has happened to following systems:

Linux 2.2.13 (RH 6.1 based)
Linux 2.2.14 (RH 6.1 based)
HP-UX 10.20
Windows NT Server 4.0

I've left stream/raped running for more than 10 minutes against all
those systems, and only HP-UX had CPU usage above normal (around 50% was
used). However, that HP-UX box is so old that any higher load of traffic
will cause it to go to 50% of CPU :)

I've tried both 'modified' (TH_ACK flag set) and original stream.c.
Nothing at all. Raped.c - nothing at all.

I don't know if it makes any difference, but all Linux boxes have
OpenWall patch (Solar Designer's) applied.

No need to publish this. It's just for stats, if anybody is collecting
it.

--
Vanja Hrustic
The Relay Group
http://relaygroup.com
Technology Ahead of Time

• Next message: FEAR Advisories: "*BSD procfs vulnerability"
• Previous message: Microsoft Product Security: "Microsoft Security Bulletin (MS00-004)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Mon Jan 24 2000 - 05:15:51 CST