Re: L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper

Subject: Re: L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper
From: gwynpARTWARE.QC.CA
Date: Wed Jan 05 2000 - 14:21:03 CST

• Next message: Georgi Guninski: "IE 5 security vulnerablity - circumventing Cross-frame security policy and accessing the DOM of "old" documents."
• Previous message: ±è¿ëÁØ KimYongJun (99Á¹¾÷): "[Hackerslab bug_paper] Solaris chkperm buffer overflow"
• In reply to: cogNiTioN: "Re: L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper"
• Reply: gwynpARTWARE.QC.CA: "Re: L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 05-Jan-00 cogNiTioN wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Dildog wrote:
>
>> L0pht Security Advisory
>>
>> Advisory Name: PamSlam
>> Advisory Released: [01/04/00]
>> Application: userhelper and PAM on Redhat Linux 6.0/6.1
> [...]
>> Description:
>>
>> The combination of the fact that both userhelper and PAM follow ..
> [...]
>> Red Hat Linux 6.0:
> [...]
>> ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.0/i386/SysVinit-2.77-2.i386.rpm
>
> Sorry if this is my newbie ass showing, but where does the SysVinit
> package fit in? It isn't mentioned in the description, the application:
> filed at the top, or even in RedHat's version of the security release.
> How come?

SysVinit >= 2.74-14 is needed by usermode-1.17-1.

-Philip

• Next message: Georgi Guninski: "IE 5 security vulnerablity - circumventing Cross-frame security policy and accessing the DOM of "old" documents."
• Previous message: ±è¿ëÁØ KimYongJun (99Á¹¾÷): "[Hackerslab bug_paper] Solaris chkperm buffer overflow"
• In reply to: cogNiTioN: "Re: L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper"
• Reply: gwynpARTWARE.QC.CA: "Re: L0pht Advisory: RH Linux 6.0/6.1, PAM and userhelper"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Thu Jan 06 2000 - 15:28:17 CST