FWD: Redhat advisory

Subject: FWD: Redhat advisory
From: Alfred Huger (ahSECURITYFOCUS.COM)
Date: Tue Jan 04 2000 - 14:43:39 CST

• Next message: Kit Knox: "[rootshell] Security Bulletin #27"
• Previous message: David TILLOY: "Re: PHP3 safe_mode and popen()"
• Next in thread: Peter W: "Re: FWD: Redhat advisory (RPM --upgrade/-U vs. --freshen/-F)"
• Reply: Peter W: "Re: FWD: Redhat advisory (RPM --upgrade/-U vs. --freshen/-F)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory

   Synopsis: New version of usermode fixes security bug
   Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:001-01
   Issue date: 2000-01-04
   Updated on: 2000-01-04
   Keywords: root userhelper pam
   Cross references:

   1. Topic:

   A security bug has been discovered and fixed in the userhelper program.

   2. Relevant releases/architectures:

   Red Hat Linux 6.0 and 6.1, all architectures.

   3. Problem description:

   A security bug was found in userhelper; the bug can be exploited to
provide local
   users with root access.

   The bug has been fixed in userhelper-1.17, and pam-0.68-10 has been
modified to
   help prevent similar attacks on other software in the future.

   4. Solution:

   For each RPM for your particular architecture, run:
   rpm -Uvh
   where filename is the name of the RPM.

   5. Bug IDs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ for more info):

   6. Obsoleted by:

   7. Conflicts with:

   8. RPMs required:

   Intel:
   ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.1/i386/pam-0.68-10.i386.rpm
   ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.1/i386/usermode-1.17-1.i386.rpm

   Alpha:
   ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.1/alpha/pam-0.68-10.alpha.rpm
   ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.1/alpha/usermode-1.17-1.alpha.rpm

   Sparc:
   ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.1/sparc/pam-0.68-10.sparc.rpm
   ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.1/sparc/usermode-1.17-1.sparc.rpm

   Source packages:
   ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.1/SRPMS/pam-0.68-10.src.rpm
   ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.1/SRPMS/usermode-1.17-1.src.rpm

   9. Verification:

   MD5 sum Package Name

   bffd4388103fa99265e267eab7ae18c8 i386/pam-0.68-10.i386.rpm
   2d69859d2b1d2180d254fc263bdccf94 i386/usermode-1.17-1.i386.rpm
   fed2c2ad4f95829e14727a9dfceaca07 alpha/pam-0.68-10.alpha.rpm
   83c69cb92b16bb0eef295acb4c857657 alpha/usermode-1.17-1.alpha.rpm
   350662253d09b17d0aca4e9c7a511675 sparc/pam-0.68-10.sparc.rpm
   d89495957c9a438fda657b8a4a5f5578 sparc/usermode-1.17-1.sparc.rpm
   f9ad800f56b7bb05ce595bad824a990d SRPMS/pam-0.68-10.src.rpm
   1d3b367d257a57de7d834043a4fcd87a SRPMS/usermode-1.17-1.src.rpm

   These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat, Inc. for security. Our key is
available
   at:
   http://www.redhat.com/corp/contact.html

   You can verify each package with the following command:
   rpm --checksig

   If you only wish to verify that each package has not been corrupted or
tampered
   with, examine only the md5sum with the following command:
   rpm --checksig --nogpg

   10. References:

   Thanks to dildogl0pht.com for finding this bug.

• Next message: Kit Knox: "[rootshell] Security Bulletin #27"
• Previous message: David TILLOY: "Re: PHP3 safe_mode and popen()"
• Next in thread: Peter W: "Re: FWD: Redhat advisory (RPM --upgrade/-U vs. --freshen/-F)"
• Reply: Peter W: "Re: FWD: Redhat advisory (RPM --upgrade/-U vs. --freshen/-F)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 21:28:30 CST